On 20 Dec 2023, at 14:32, Simon Horman wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 02:23:16PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 20 Dec 2023, at 8:38, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 Dec 2023, at 19:45, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 06:38:57PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 01:44:29PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>>>>>> Currently, if you use the python/test_requirements.txt file to
>>>>>> set up your test environment the MFEX tests will be skipped due
>>>>>> to the Scapy package not being included. This is fixed as part
>>>>>> of this patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The test case change will make sure the 'MFEX Configuration' test
>>>>>> will run without the need for Scapy and its auto-generated tests.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In addition, we exclude the traffic-related MFEX tests from running
>>>>>> on GitHub actions due to limited resources.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <[email protected]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>> I do notice that, perhaps by chance, the GitHub actions failed
>>>> on this particular patch as the linux clang test assan job
>>>> ran for more than 30 minutes.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can bump timeout-minutes up a bit in build-and-test.yaml?
>>>
>>> Yes, I did notice this also, but I did over 200 runs on GitHub and it did 
>>> not happen before. So for now I assume it’s a glitch, but I plan to submit 
>>> another patch merging ubsan/asan (like OVN) and add this for some dp tests 
>>> also. Which will probably result in splitting the run. But this needs needs 
>>> this patch merged first.
>>>
>>> //Eelco
>>
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> I noticed you marked the patch series as ‘change requested’, is this because 
>> of the above? If so, I do not think this should be part of this series. I 
>> looked at the recent runs, and this test takes an average of 13 minutes, so 
>> I assume something was wrong outside of OVS, with the Github infra causing 
>> the extreme delay.
>
> Yes, sorry, I was a bit hasty there.
> I'll set the patches as "Under Review" and delegate them to you.
>
> Given your explanation above I have no objections to this series being
> merged.

Thanks, I’ll try to merge them before the end of the week!

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to