On 4/5/24 14:33, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4 Apr 2024, at 14:09, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> 
>> ukey_install() returns boolean signaling if the ukey was installed
>> or not.  Installation may fail for a few reasons:
>>
>>  1. Conflicting ukey.
>>  2. Mutex contention while trying to replace existing ukey.
>>  3. The same ukey already exists and active.
>>
>> Only the first case here signals an actual problem.  Third one is
>> a little odd for userspace datapath, but harmless.  Second is the
>> most common one that can easily happen during normal operation
>> since other threads like revalidators may be currently working on
>> this ukey preventing an immediate access.
>>
>> Since only the first case is actually worth logging and it already
>> has its own log message, removing the 'upcall installation fails'
>> warning from the upcall_cb().  This should fix most of the random
>> failures of userspace system tests in CI.
>>
>> While at it, also fixing coverage counters.  Mutex contention was
>> mistakenly counted as a duplicate upcall.  ukey contention for
>> revalidators was counted only in one of two places.
>>
>> New counter added for the ukey contention on replace.  We should
>> not re-use existing upcall_ukey_contention counter for this, since
>> it may lead to double counting.
>>
>> Fixes: 67f08985d769 ("upcall: Replace ukeys for deleted flows.")
>> Fixes: 9cec8274ed9a ("ofproto-dpif-upcall: Add VLOG_WARN_RL logs for 
>> upcall_cb() error.")
>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org>
>> ---
> 
> Thanks for looking into this, and the patch looks good to me.
> 
> Maybe we should have another patch fixing some of the namings?
> 
>   upcall_ukey_replace -> ukey_replace
>   handler_duplicate_upcall -> duplicate_upcall
>   upcall_ukey_contention -> revalidate_ukey_contention -> ukey_contention

I had something similar in mind, but I didn't make any radical
renaming since I plan to backport this change.

One more thing is that we would likely want to distinguish
contention in handlers/pmds from contention in revalidators,
so these will need separate counters, I think.

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Eelco
> 
> Acked-by: Eelco Chaudron <echau...@redhat.com>
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to