On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:25 PM Vladislav Odintsov <odiv...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> These structure members are read in pinctrl_handler() in a separare thread.
> This is unsafe: when IDL is re-connected or some IDL objects are freed
> after svc_monitors list with svc_monitor structures, which point to
> sbrec_service_monitor is initialized, sb_svc_mon structure property can
> point to wrong address, which then leads to segmentation fault in
> svc_monitor_send_tcp_health_check__() and
> svc_monitor_send_udp_health_check() on accessing svc_mon->sb_svc_mon.
>
> Imagine situation:
>
> Main ovn-controller thread:
> 1. Connects to SB and fills IDL with DB contents.
> 2. run pinctrl_run() with pinctrl mutex and sync_svc_monitors() as a part
>    of it.
> 3. Release mutex.
>
> ...
> 4. Loss of OVNSB connection for any reason (network outage/inactivity probe
>    timeout/etc), start new main-loop iteration, re-initialize IDL in
>    ovsdb_idl_run() (which probably will destroy previous IDL objects).
> ...
>
> pinctrl thread:
> 5. Awake from poll_block().
> ... run new iteration in its main loop ...
> 6. Aqcuire mutex lock.
> 7. Run svc_monitors_run(), run svc_monitor_send_tcp_health_check__() or
>    svc_monitor_send_udp_health_check(), which try to access IDL objects
>    with outdated pointers.
>
> 8. Segmentation fault:
>
> Stack trace of thread 212406:
> >> __GI_strlen (libc.so.6)
> >> inet_pton (libc.so.6)
> >> ip_parse (ovn-controller)
> >> svc_monitor_send_tcp_health_check__.part.37 (ovn-controller)
> >> svc_monitor_send_health_check (ovn-controller)
> >> pinctrl_handler (ovn-controller)
> >> ovsthread_wrapper (ovn-controller)
> >> start_thread (libpthread.so.0)
> >> __clone (libc.so.6)
>
> This patch removes unsafe access to IDL objects from pinctrl thread.
> New svc_monitor structure members are used to store needed data.
>
> CC: Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org>
> Fixes: 8be01f4a5329 ("Send service monitor health checks")
> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Odintsov <odiv...@gmail.com>
> ---
>

Hi Vladislav,

thank you for the fix. I have one comment down below.


>  controller/pinctrl.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/controller/pinctrl.c b/controller/pinctrl.c
> index 6a2c3dc68..b843edb35 100644
> --- a/controller/pinctrl.c
> +++ b/controller/pinctrl.c
> @@ -7307,6 +7307,9 @@ struct svc_monitor {
>      long long int timestamp;
>      bool is_ip6;
>
> +    struct eth_addr src_mac;
> +    struct in6_addr src_ip;
> +
>      long long int wait_time;
>      long long int next_send_time;
>
> @@ -7501,6 +7504,15 @@ sync_svc_monitors(struct ovsdb_idl_txn
> *ovnsb_idl_txn,
>              svc_mon->n_success = 0;
>              svc_mon->n_failures = 0;
>
> +            eth_addr_from_string(sb_svc_mon->src_mac, &svc_mon->src_mac);
> +            if (is_ipv4) {
> +                ovs_be32 ip4_src;
> +                ip_parse(sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &ip4_src);
> +                svc_mon->src_ip = in6_addr_mapped_ipv4(ip4_src);
> +            } else {
> +                ipv6_parse(sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &svc_mon->src_ip);
> +            }
> +
>

The whole if else block can be replaced with ip46_parse().

             hmap_insert(&svc_monitors_map, &svc_mon->hmap_node, hash);
>              ovs_list_push_back(&svc_monitors, &svc_mon->list_node);
>              changed = true;
> @@ -8259,19 +8271,14 @@ svc_monitor_send_tcp_health_check__(struct rconn
> *swconn,
>      struct dp_packet packet;
>      dp_packet_use_stub(&packet, packet_stub, sizeof packet_stub);
>
> -    struct eth_addr eth_src;
> -    eth_addr_from_string(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_mac, &eth_src);
>      if (svc_mon->is_ip6) {
> -        struct in6_addr ip6_src;
> -        ipv6_parse(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &ip6_src);
> -        pinctrl_compose_ipv6(&packet, eth_src, svc_mon->ea,
> -                             &ip6_src, &svc_mon->ip, IPPROTO_TCP,
> +        pinctrl_compose_ipv6(&packet, svc_mon->src_mac, svc_mon->ea,
> +                             &svc_mon->src_ip, &svc_mon->ip, IPPROTO_TCP,
>                               63, TCP_HEADER_LEN);
>      } else {
> -        ovs_be32 ip4_src;
> -        ip_parse(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &ip4_src);
> -        pinctrl_compose_ipv4(&packet, eth_src, svc_mon->ea,
> -                             ip4_src,
> in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->ip),
> +        pinctrl_compose_ipv4(&packet, svc_mon->src_mac, svc_mon->ea,
> +                             in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->src_ip),
> +                             in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->ip),
>                               IPPROTO_TCP, 63, TCP_HEADER_LEN);
>      }
>
> @@ -8327,24 +8334,18 @@ svc_monitor_send_udp_health_check(struct rconn
> *swconn,
>                                    struct svc_monitor *svc_mon,
>                                    ovs_be16 udp_src)
>  {
> -    struct eth_addr eth_src;
> -    eth_addr_from_string(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_mac, &eth_src);
> -
>      uint64_t packet_stub[128 / 8];
>      struct dp_packet packet;
>      dp_packet_use_stub(&packet, packet_stub, sizeof packet_stub);
>
>      if (svc_mon->is_ip6) {
> -        struct in6_addr ip6_src;
> -        ipv6_parse(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &ip6_src);
> -        pinctrl_compose_ipv6(&packet, eth_src, svc_mon->ea,
> -                             &ip6_src, &svc_mon->ip, IPPROTO_UDP,
> +        pinctrl_compose_ipv6(&packet, svc_mon->src_mac, svc_mon->ea,
> +                             &svc_mon->src_ip, &svc_mon->ip, IPPROTO_UDP,
>                               63, UDP_HEADER_LEN + 8);
>      } else {
> -        ovs_be32 ip4_src;
> -        ip_parse(svc_mon->sb_svc_mon->src_ip, &ip4_src);
> -        pinctrl_compose_ipv4(&packet, eth_src, svc_mon->ea,
> -                             ip4_src,
> in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->ip),
> +        pinctrl_compose_ipv4(&packet, svc_mon->src_mac, svc_mon->ea,
> +                             in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->src_ip),
> +                             in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&svc_mon->ip),
>                               IPPROTO_UDP, 63, UDP_HEADER_LEN + 8);
>      }
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
>
>
Other than that it looks good, feel free to add "Acked-by: Ales Musil <
amu...@redhat.com>" to v2.

Thanks,
Ales

-- 

Ales Musil

Senior Software Engineer - OVN Core

Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com>

amu...@redhat.com
<https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to