On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 15:00:03 -0400 Aaron Conole wrote: > I agree, this is an issue. BUT I think it might be better to just > filter by field type up front. See: > > https://github.com/apconole/linux-next-work/commit/7262107de7170d44b6dbf6c5ea6f7e6c0bb71d36#diff-3e72e7405c6bb4e9842bed5f63883ca930387086bb40d4034e92ed83a5decb4bR441 > > That version I think ends up being much easier to follow. If you want > to take it for your series, feel free. If you disagree, maybe there's > something I'm not considering about it. > > NOTE that version is just a bunch of independent changes that are > squashed together. I have a cleaner version. > > I can also bundle up the series I have so far and submit, but I didn't > want to do that until I got all the pmtu.sh support working. Maybe it > makes sense to send it now though. Simon, Jakub - wdyt?
I'd say - hold onto the changes until pmtu.sh works, unless there's *any* reason for a particular patch to go in early, eg: - patch fixes existing bug - someone else needs a patch - ... - a patch which falls under some of the criteria above depends on the patch _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
