On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 4:22 PM Mike Pattrick <m...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 8:23 AM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > A final note, I suspect all those checks negatively impact non tso > > packets processing when OVS tso is enabled. > > > > Would it be feasible to mark that tso (or a tx offload) has been > > requested at the "batch" level? > > This is more an optimisation... maybe in the future? > > I've been thinking about changing the trunc member to a flags bit > array lately in other contexts as well. It would be useful to mark if > a batch has fragmented packets, if there is mixed memory between > mbuf's and other types of packet source memory, there should be other > uses as well. Having batch flags would remove a few instances of > iterating over the whole batch. > > I think this is a seperate patch though.
Yes. TSO is still marked experimental and we can wait for such optimisations. Thanks Mike. -- David Marchand _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
