Clang analyzer will complain about floating point operations conducted with integer types as rounding is undefined. In pmd_info_show_rxq() a percentage was calculated inside uint64 integers instead of a floating pointer variable for a user visible message. There isn't a good reason not to use dloating point types here.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pattrick <m...@redhat.com> --- lib/dpif-netdev.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/dpif-netdev.c b/lib/dpif-netdev.c index f0594e5f5..69d5ddfa1 100644 --- a/lib/dpif-netdev.c +++ b/lib/dpif-netdev.c @@ -900,8 +900,8 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, if (pmd->core_id != NON_PMD_CORE_ID) { struct rxq_poll *list; size_t n_rxq; - uint64_t total_pmd_cycles = 0; - uint64_t busy_pmd_cycles = 0; + double total_pmd_cycles = 0; + double busy_pmd_cycles = 0; uint64_t total_rxq_proc_cycles = 0; unsigned int intervals; @@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, for (int i = 0; i < n_rxq; i++) { struct dp_netdev_rxq *rxq = list[i].rxq; const char *name = netdev_rxq_get_name(rxq->rx); - uint64_t rxq_proc_cycles = 0; + double rxq_proc_cycles = 0; rxq_proc_cycles = get_interval_values(rxq->cycles_intrvl, &rxq->intrvl_idx, @@ -942,9 +942,8 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, ? "(enabled) " : "(disabled)"); ds_put_format(reply, " pmd usage: "); if (total_pmd_cycles) { - ds_put_format(reply, "%2"PRIu64"", - rxq_proc_cycles * 100 / total_pmd_cycles); - ds_put_cstr(reply, " %"); + ds_put_format(reply, "%2.0f %%", + (rxq_proc_cycles * 100) / total_pmd_cycles); } else { ds_put_format(reply, "%s", "NOT AVAIL"); } @@ -954,13 +953,14 @@ pmd_info_show_rxq(struct ds *reply, struct dp_netdev_pmd_thread *pmd, if (n_rxq > 0) { ds_put_cstr(reply, " overhead: "); if (total_pmd_cycles) { - uint64_t overhead_cycles = 0; + double overhead_cycles = 0; if (total_rxq_proc_cycles < busy_pmd_cycles) { overhead_cycles = busy_pmd_cycles - total_rxq_proc_cycles; } - ds_put_format(reply, "%2"PRIu64" %%", - overhead_cycles * 100 / total_pmd_cycles); + + ds_put_format(reply, "%2.0f %%", + (overhead_cycles * 100) / total_pmd_cycles); } else { ds_put_cstr(reply, "NOT AVAIL"); } -- 2.43.5 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev