Let's use min()/max() to simplify the code and fix the
Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by minmax.cocci.

Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongb...@huawei.com>
---
 net/dccp/ackvec.c | 2 +-
 net/dccp/dccp.h   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dccp/ackvec.c b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
index 1cba001bb4c8..faadd0190107 100644
--- a/net/dccp/ackvec.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void dccp_ackvec_clear_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const 
u64 ackno)
         * Deal with overlapping Ack Vectors: don't subtract more than the
         * number of packets between tail_ackno and ack_ackno.
         */
-       eff_runlen = delta < avr->avr_ack_runlen ? delta : avr->avr_ack_runlen;
+       eff_runlen = min(delta, avr->avr_ack_runlen);
 
        runlen_now = dccp_ackvec_runlen(av->av_buf + avr->avr_ack_ptr);
        /*
diff --git a/net/dccp/dccp.h b/net/dccp/dccp.h
index 1f748ed1279d..872d17fb85b5 100644
--- a/net/dccp/dccp.h
+++ b/net/dccp/dccp.h
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ static inline u64 dccp_loss_count(const u64 s1, const u64 
s2, const u64 ndp)
        WARN_ON(delta < 0);
        delta -= ndp + 1;
 
-       return delta > 0 ? delta : 0;
+       return max(delta, 0);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.34.1

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to