On 4/2/25 10:34 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> The OpenFlow mailing list archives at mailman.stanford.edu appear
> to be permanently offline. So use URLs of archives at archive.org instead.

Should we maybe use the mail archive links instead?
The following seems to be the referenced threads:

https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00663.html
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00447.html

What do you think?

We may also try to ping Ben, I guess, maybe he knows someone who can figure out
why the list disappeared.  I see the openflow-spec list archive is still there.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

> 
> Flagged by make check-doc.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
> ---
>  Documentation/topics/design.rst  | 2 +-
>  Documentation/topics/porting.rst | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/topics/design.rst b/Documentation/topics/design.rst
> index 656d60673e98..d06472687b2f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/topics/design.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/topics/design.rst
> @@ -459,7 +459,7 @@ is, the first byte of the encapsulated frame immediately 
> follows the
>  same way for compatibility.
>  
>  For an earlier discussion, please see the thread archived at:
> -https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-August/002604.html
> +https://web.archive.org/web/https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-August/002604.html
>  
>  [*] The quoted definition is directly from OF1.1.  Definitions used inside 
> OVS
>  omit the 8-byte ``ofp_header`` members, so the sizes in this discussion are
> diff --git a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst 
> b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
> index b627fde12607..2e56d571255f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/topics/porting.rst
> @@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ packet to software, slowing down not just UDPv6 but all 
> IPv6 processing.
>  
>  .. [1] Aaron Rosen, "Modify packet fields extremely slow",
>      openflow-discuss mailing list, June 26, 2011, archived at
> -    
> https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-June/002386.html.
> +https://web.archive.org/web/https://mailman.stanford.edu/pipermail/openflow-discuss/2011-June/002386.html.
>  
>  Questions
>  ---------
> 

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to