On 8/29/25 7:56 PM, Mark Michelson via dev wrote:
> OVN has grown in popularity over the years, and as a result, we are
> receiving many more feature request patches than we had in previous
> release cycles. The past two or three release cycles, we have had to
> either delay soft freeze or extend soft freeze in order to allow for
> requested submissions to be considered.
> 
> This documentation change proposes extending the soft freeze period from
> two weeks to four weeks, to give more time for reviews prior to testing.
> 
> From the release calendar update in 2026, you can see that the way this
> is accomplished is by moving the branch and subsequent release two weeks
> later than they had previously been. The other option was to move soft
> freeze two weeks earlier, but this has the potential to cause problems
> for patches that rely on new OVS features. OVS soft freeze currently
> ends right as OVN's is beginning. Thus if an OVN feature relies on an
> OVS patch to go in first, then it works out well with the current
> schedule. If OVN and OVS have overlapping soft freeze periods, then
> trying to get the OVN patches reviewed could be a challenge.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Michelson <[email protected]>
> ---
> There are no changes to this patch from the RFC version.
> ---

Hi Mark,

This looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>

Regards,
Dumitru

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to