On 9/29/25 10:35 AM, Ales Musil wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2025 at 12:20 AM Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> ADD_VETH() was incorrectly called in the test, its signature is:
>>  ADD_VETH([port], [namespace], [ovs-br], [ip_addr] [mac_addr], [gateway],
>>           [ip_addr_flags] [ip6_addr] [gateway6])
>>
>> The [ip_addr] and [gateway] arguments were swapped.  While this doesn't
>> affect the test outcome because there's no actual traffic flowing, it's
>> just confusing and will break once we try to test with traffic.
>>
>> Fixes: 6b66d634d781 ("northd: Add an option to specify EVPN vni in logical
>> switches.")
>> Signed-off-by: Dumitru Ceara <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  tests/system-ovn.at | 8 ++++----
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/system-ovn.at b/tests/system-ovn.at
>> index 3a321f84a4..85e432e75d 100644
>> --- a/tests/system-ovn.at
>> +++ b/tests/system-ovn.at
>> @@ -18296,12 +18296,12 @@ check ovn-nbctl
>>                   \
>>      -- lsp-set-options ln_port network_name=phynet
>>
>>  ADD_NAMESPACES(workload1)
>> -ADD_VETH(workload1, workload1, br-int, "172.16.1.1/24",
>> "f0:00:0f:16:01:10", \
>> -         "172.16.1.10")
>> +ADD_VETH(workload1, workload1, br-int, "172.16.1.10/24",
>> "f0:00:0f:16:01:10", \
>> +         "172.16.1.1")
>>
>>  ADD_NAMESPACES(workload2)
>> -ADD_VETH(workload2, workload2, br-int, "172.16.1.1/24",
>> "f0:00:0f:16:01:20", \
>> -         "172.16.1.20")
>> +ADD_VETH(workload2, workload2, br-int, "172.16.1.20/24",
>> "f0:00:0f:16:01:20", \
>> +         "172.16.1.1")
>>
>>  OVN_POPULATE_ARP
>>  check ovn-nbctl --wait=hv sync
>> --
>> 2.51.0
>>
>>
> Look good to me, thanks.
> Acked-by: Ales Musil <[email protected]>
> 

Hi Ales,

Thanks for the review!  Applied to main and 25.09.

Regards,
Dumitru


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Reply via email to