From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Darrell Ball 
<db...@vmware.com>
Date: Sunday, June 11, 2017 at 10:55 AM
To: Hui Xiang <xiangh...@gmail.com>, "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" 
<ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK polling cycles and processing cycles for pmd



From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Hui Xiang 
<xiangh...@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, June 10, 2017 at 9:06 PM
To: "ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org" <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: [ovs-discuss] OVS-DPDK polling cycles and processing cycles for pmd

Hi guys,

  I got below results on my environment, but confusing with the cycles 
percents, it looks like the polling plus processing cycles per pmd is 100%, but 
as I recalled there are some improvment document that showed their processing 
cycles are 100% percents which means 0 for polling cycles? how should be the 
rate of polling and processing cycles take? should it be better for less 
polling and much processing for performance's benefits?

“polling” is checking for packets, but there are none to process.

Above will be the definition when
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/729970/
is pushed.
In the software that you are using,  “polling” is the time spent polling
when there are no packets and also polling/receiving/batching packets.
Using this definition, polling percentage will not go below “some value”,
since even if all polling cycles receive packets that time spent 
polling/receiving/batching
is counted as “polling”.


input more packets -> higher “processing” percentage.

pmd thread numa_id 1 core_id 27:
emc hits:141332792126
megaflow hits:263
avg. subtable lookups per hit:1.00
miss:59
lost:0
polling cycles:19832152639760 (12.60%)
processing cycles:137517517407771 (87.40%)
avg cycles per packet: 1113.33 (157349670047531/141332792711)
avg processing cycles per packet: 973.01 (137517517407771/141332792711)


Thanks a lot.
BR.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to