This is mostly for historical reasons, by the way. We'd accept a patch that adds DNS support. (It's nontrivial though because it would have to be asynchronous.)
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:16:36PM -0700, Shivaram Mysore wrote: > Thanks Ben for clarification. Much appreciated. > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 1:15 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 01:09:07PM -0700, Shivaram Mysore wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am trying to use FQDN for controller name - example: > > > > > > # ovs-vsctl set-controller ovs-br0 ssl:faucet.example.com:6653 > > > > > > Per OVS logs, I see the below errors: > > > > > > Address family not supported by protocol > > > connection failed (Address family not supported by protocol) > > > > > > *Question*: can we not set FQDN as a valid controller name? > > > > No. As documented, OVS requires the controller to be set by IP address. > > _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
