On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 at 00:08 Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:26:38PM +0000, Darrell Ball wrote: > > > > > > From: <ovs-discuss-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of James Page < > james.p...@ubuntu.com> > > Date: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 at 2:49 AM > > To: "b...@openvswitch.org" <b...@openvswitch.org> > > Subject: [ovs-discuss] [openvswitch 2.8.0 dpdk] testsuite: 1211 1212 > 1213 1214 1215 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1224 1225 1226 2338 failed > > > > Hi > > > > I'm cutting builds from branch-2.8 in preparation for the ovs 2.8.0 > release for Ubuntu; we build and test two sets of binaries - a vanilla one > and one with dpdk enabled. > > > > I see test failures on all of the "ofproto-dpif - conntrack" tests with > the DPDK build and with the ovn ACL test (see attached logs). Vanilla > build is fine. > > > > James > > > > These are generic tests and should not be run with-dpdk set. > > If you run these tests --with-dpdk, some tests will consider the packets > coming an actual dpdk interface, which they are not. > > In this case, the packets will be marked with a bad checksum. > > All of the tests in the testsuite should always pass, or be skipped, > regardless of configuration, so if some of the tests are inappropriate > for a given configuration then they need AT_SKIP_IF([...]) to ensure > that they get skipped. >
Glad to hear that - as part of the vanilla and DPDK binary builds, we run the complete test suite with both sets of binaries; the smaller the sauce we have to apply in the execution of the tests for the DPDK build the better! Cheers James
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
