On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 4:35 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo <majop...@redhat.com > wrote:
> Oh, thank you Ben, > > That's fantastic, I didn't know that was based on rally. > > I have to give it a try, and sync with mr Mestery. > Russell, were you involved in this? > Not involved, but aware of it. It helps simulate larger scale by running many instances of OVN on a single host using ovs-sandbox (or at least a similar technique). I've added Han Zhou and Lei Huang, where the project originally came from. > > Best regards, > Miguel Ángel. > > > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:39 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:01:33PM +0100, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: >> > Today during coffee I was discussing with Jakub the idea of having >> > some sort of "rally" [1] [2] like project to measure the native reponse >> > of OVN at scale, measuring things like: >> > >> > * NB object creation to SB update >> > * Tap creation to SB port binding, and to connectivity. >> > * dnat NAT association to dnat connectivity >> > >> > * any other ideas? >> > >> > >> > This project has been specially helpful (in OpenStack) to detect race >> > conditions and bottlenecks. But I'm afraid that the OpenStack overhead >> > hide the real OVN numbers. >> >> I support adding some OVN testing, especially scale testing. There is a >> dormant ovn scale testing project that might be a place to start (I've >> never looked at it personally): >> https://github.com/openvswitch/ovn-scale-test >> > > -- Russell Bryant
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss