Hi Ben, After [0] got merged the compaction code is not there anymore. How is this being done now? Also, can we get the backport of [1][2] to 2.9 branch?
[0] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/1b1d2e6daa563cc91f974ffdc082fb3a8b424801 [1] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/1cfdc175ab1ecbc8f5d22f78d8e5f4344d55c5dc#diff-62fba9ea73e44f70aa9f56228bd4658c [2] https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs/commit/69f453713459c60e5619174186f94a0975891580 On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:21 PM, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez <dalva...@redhat.com > wrote: > Ok, I've just sent a patch and if you're not convinced we can > just do the 2x change. Thanks a lot! > Daniel > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > >> I guess I wouldn't object. >> >> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 10:11:11PM +0100, Daniel Alvarez Sanchez wrote: >> > Thanks Ben and Mark. I'd be okay with 2x. >> > Don't you think that apart from that it can still be good to compact >> after >> > a >> > certain amount of time (like 1 day) if the number of transactions is > 0 >> > regardless of the size? >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: >> > >> > > It would be trivial to change 4x to 2x. 4x was just the suggestion in >> > > the Raft thesis. If 2x would make everyone a little more comfortable, >> > > let's make that change. >> > > >> > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
