I mean OpenFlow flows that are persistent across OVS or system restarts. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 9:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Multiple dpdk-netdev datapath with OVS 2.9

What do you mean by "persist the OVS flows"?  I have a couple of guesses but
I'd like to hear from you.

On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 02:17:18AM +0500, [email protected]
wrote:
> Thank you Ben for the correction. I am running tests with different 
> scenarios to better understand what's happening inside the OVS-DPDK. 
> One thing that I would like to ask is, is there a way to persist the OVS
flows?
> Can OVN help me do that? I don't have any virtual networks, just in 
> and out ports.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, May 4, 2018 11:29 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Multiple dpdk-netdev datapath with OVS 2.9
> 
> It's mostly for historical reasons.
> 
> We do try to document in ovs-vswitchd(8) that the user should not 
> manage datapaths themselves:
> 
>        ovs-vswitchd does all the necessary management of Open vSwitch
>        datapaths itself.  Thus, external tools, such ovs-dpctl(8), are
>        not needed for managing datapaths in conjunction with
>        ovs-vswitchd, and their use to modify datapaths when ovs-vswitchd
>        is running can interfere with its operation.  (ovs-dpctl may
>        still be useful for diagnostics.)
> 
> I guess that the wording should be updated to reflect the "ovs-appctl"
> interface too.
> 
> I sent a patch to improve the docs here:
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/908532/
> 
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0500, [email protected]
> wrote:
> > If "ovs-vswitchd" manages the data paths, why does it have a utility 
> > that lets me create more of them. And when I create them I cannot 
> > use them. I am stuck in a loop :) .
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2018 4:41 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-discuss] Multiple dpdk-netdev datapath with OVS 
> > 2.9
> > 
> > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:02:04PM +0500, 
> > [email protected]
> > wrote:
> > > I am trying to create multiple dpdk-netdev based data paths with 
> > > OVS
> > > 2.9 and DPDK 16.11 running on CentOS 7.4. I am able to create 
> > > multiple data paths using "ovs-appctl dpctl/add-dp netdev@netdev1"
> > > and I can see a new data path created with "ovs-appctl dpctl/show". 
> > > However I cannot add any interfaces (dpdk or otherwise), and I 
> > > cannot set this data path as datapath_type to any bridge.
> > 
> > That's not useful or a good idea.  ovs-vswitchd manages datapaths
itself.
> > Adding and removing them yourself will not help.
> > 
> > > Just a precap to why I am trying to do this, I am working with a 
> > > lot of OVS OpenFlow rules (around 0.5 million) matching layer 3 
> > > and layer
> > > 4 fields. The incoming traffic is more than 40G (4 x10G Intel 
> > > x520s), and has multiple parallel flows (over a million IPs). With 
> > > this the OVS performance decreases and each port is forwarding 
> > > only around 250 Mb/s. I am using multiple RX queues (4-6), with 
> > > single RX queue it drops to 70 Mb/s. Now if I shutdown three 10G 
> > > interfaces, an interesting thing happen, and OVS starts forwarding 
> > > over 7Gb/s for that single interface. That got me thinking, maybe 
> > > the reason for low performance is 40 G traffic hitting a single 
> > > bridges flow tables, how about creating multiple bridges with 
> > > multiple flow tables. With this setup the situation remained same, 
> > > and now the only common thing between the
> > > 4 interfaces is the data path. They are not sharing anything else. 
> > > They are polled by dedicated vCPUs, and they are in different tables.
> > > 
> > >  
> > > 
> > > Can anyone explain this bizarre scenario of why the OVS is able to 
> > > forward more traffic over single interface polled by 6 vCPUs, 
> > > compared to 4 interfaces polled by 24 vCPUs.
> > > 
> > > Also is there a way to create multiple data paths and remove this 
> > > dependency also.
> > 
> > You can create multiple bridges with "ovs-vsctl add-br".  OVS 
> > doesn't use multiple datapaths.
> > 
> > Maybe someone who understands the DPDK port better can suggest some 
> > reason for the performance characteristics that you see.
> > 
> 

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss

Reply via email to