On 31 August 2018 at 08:05, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote: > > Well, that wouldn't be too hard, I guess. It's too bad that there's no > > way with a Table Features Request to just modify *some* of the > > properties of a table (such as the name). I guess that Faucet would > > have to spit back at OVS all the capabilities that OVS says it supports, > > and then OVS would have to verify that it was actually the same. That > > seems a little prone to error, but probably we could get it right. > > It was more work than I expected (what isn't?) but I did finish it: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openvswitch/list/?series=63372 > or > https://github.com/blp/ovs-reviews/tree/multipart-requests2
Perfect, We had a play internally with mod-table and it seems to work. We are a little swamped at faucet at the moment due to some impending deployment deadlines but I have raised a feature request against faucet to use the new code: https://github.com/faucetsdn/faucet/issues/2420 I have also submitted a patch upstream for updating the faucet tutorial, do let me know if you want any changes! https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2018-September/352046.html Brad
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
