Hi Lucas,
Is it OK to discuss OpenStack integration here? Otherwise, please let
me know which OpenStack email list we can use.
I am running networking scaling test. The target is 4K isolated private
networks with external/public access via logical routers. The test in
my previous email is to add 256 routers and set them as gateway. When I
use openstack cli to create a router and set it as gateway immediately,
it doesn’t work some times, Neutron complaints that the router is not
found.
for c in `seq 0 1 255`; do
echo "INFO: $op router-$c..."
openstack router $op router-$c
if [ "$op" == "create" ]; then
openstack router set \
--external-gateway public \
--fixed-ip ip-address=10.6.33.$c \
--disable-snat \
router-$c
fi
done
I thought Neutron API call is synchronous, which means when the client
gets the response for a creation request, the object is created. But
OVN part is async. Is that right? That’s why I was asking reading is
from Neutron DB or OVN DB. If the reading is from Neutron DB, I don’t
understand why the router can not be found when client sets it?
Any thought here?
I changed test script to create all 256 routers first, then set them.
It works fine. It kind of proves that it’s not guaranteed that the
object is ready after receiving the response. I don’t believe this is
expected.
Now, I am adding subnets to router, 16 subnets to 1 router. It’s 4096
networks on 256 routers. It’s quit slow and I am getting some errors.
INFO: Add subnet-1-0 to router-1...
BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for url:
http://10.6.20.200:9696/v2.0/routers/3d9bff46-4eba-4621-b7c4-3c3062ab8d6e/add_router_interface,
Bad router request: Router already has a port on subnet
9d8d1f2d-a401-4ad9-9a72-0d530fba2085.
INFO: Add subnet-1-16 to router-1...
INFO: Add subnet-1-32 to router-1...
ConflictException: 409: Client Error for url:
http://10.6.20.200:9696/v2.0/routers/3d9bff46-4eba-4621-b7c4-3c3062ab8d6e/add_router_interface,
IP address 192.168.1.33 already allocated in subnet
e44dee36-0ee4-4c23-91cf-1ac5b9ee07e0
INFO: Add subnet-1-48 to router-1...
INFO: Add subnet-1-64 to router-1...
HttpException: 500: Server Error for url:
http://10.6.20.200:9696/v2.0/routers/3d9bff46-4eba-4621-b7c4-3c3062ab8d6e/add_router_interface,
Request Failed: internal server error while processing your request.
I am not sure if that’s because I add subnets to one router back to back.
I will try another way to add subnet to avoid such back to back requests
to the same router. Will see if that helps.
Thanks!
Tony
From: Lucas Alvares Gomes<mailto:lucasago...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 2:22 AM
To: Numan Siddique<mailto:num...@ovn.org>
Cc: Tony Liu<mailto:tonyliu0...@hotmail.com>;
ovs-...@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-...@openvswitch.org>; Lucas Alvares Gomes
Martins<mailto:lmart...@redhat.com>;
ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org<mailto:ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [ovs-discuss] OVN: configuration in Neutron DB?
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 7:42 AM Numan Siddique <num...@ovn.org> wrote:
>
> Adding Daniel and Lucas. Maybe you can also include opendev ML to get
> appropriate responses from the OpenStack side.
>
> Please see below for few comments.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:02 PM Tony Liu <tonyliu0...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Quick update. I changed the script to create 256 routers first, then set
> > each of them as gateway.
> > There is no create and set back to back. It seems working fine now.
> >
> > It would be good someone can clarify my questions. It seems that it's
> > not guaranteed that the
> > object is ready when client get OK response of creation request. Is this
> > expected?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tony
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* dev <ovs-dev-boun...@openvswitch.org> on behalf of Tony Liu <
> > tonyliu0...@hotmail.com>
> > *Sent:* July 28, 2020 10:37 PM
> > *To:* ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org <ovs-discuss@openvswitch.org>;
> > ovs-...@openvswitch.org <ovs-...@openvswitch.org>
> > *Subject:* [ovs-dev] OVN: configuration in Neutron DB?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > In case of integration with OpenStack, for example, when a client requests
> > to create a network,
> > is this network configuration saved in both Neutron DB and OVN DB, or OVN
> > DB only?
> >
>
> The neutron API first saves in the neutron db and the neutron OVN mechanism
> driver will talk
> to the Northbound ovsdb-server and create corresponding OVN logical
> resources.
>
Both as numans said, it's first created in the Neutron database and
then the OVN plugin is invoked to create that resource in the OVN NB
database. We usually use the "name" column in the OVN NB DB to store
the correspondent Neutron UUID, if the resource has no "name" column
we then use the external_ids columns to do it.
In your example, a Neutron network corresponds to a Logical_Switch in OVN:
stack@lucas-devstack-2:~/neutron$ openstack network create test
| id | 702c4ccd-2f9e-43c8-99a8-4b07a509e105 |
...
stack@lucas-devstack-2:~/neutron$ ovn-nbctl list logical_switch
external_ids : {"neutron:mtu"="1442",
"neutron:network_name"=test, "neutron:revision_number"="1"}
name : neutron-702c4ccd-2f9e-43c8-99a8-4b07a509e105\
...
So the correspondent Logical Switch in OVN is named as "neutron-<Neutron UUID>"
>
> > Also, when a client gets a network from Neutron API, is the configuration
> > read from Neutron DB
> > or OVN DB?
> >
>
> I think its read from the neutron DB.
>
That's right, it reads from the Neutron database.
>
>
> >
> > Other than coding, is there any doc about how Neutron OVN ML2 driver works?
> >
>
> You can refer here -
> https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/admin/ovn/refarch/refarch.html
>
Yeah that's the part of the documentation we have that matches with
your questions, let us know if you have more questions and perhaps we
can enhance that document with the answers.
>
> >
> > I have this script to create 256 routers and set each of them as gateway.
> > router()
> > {
> > local op=$1
> >
> > for c in `seq 0 1 255`; do
> > echo "INFO: $op router-$c..."
> > openstack router $op router-$c
> > if [ "$op" == "create" ]; then
> > openstack router set \
> > --external-gateway public \
> > --fixed-ip ip-address=10.6.33.$c \
> > --disable-snat \
> > router-$c
> > fi
> > done
> > }
> > I see lots failures from Neutron log when get/show a router. It seems like
> > that, when setting a router,
> > the router is not completely ready yet. Is it possible?
> >
> > After running that script, I see some logical routers in ovn-nb-db don't
> > have gw_port_id. And there
> > are some duplications. Here is an example. Each of them has unique UUID.
> >
> > external_ids : {"neutron:gw_port_id"="",
> > "neutron:revision_number"="1", "neutron:router_name"=router-255}
> > external_ids : {"neutron:gw_port_id"="",
> > "neutron:revision_number"="1", "neutron:router_name"=router-232}
> > external_ids : {"neutron:gw_port_id"="",
> > "neutron:revision_number"="0", "neutron:router_name"=router-158}
> > external_ids : {"neutron:gw_port_id"="",
> > "neutron:revision_number"="0", "neutron:router_name"=router-158}
> > external_ids :
> > {"neutron:gw_port_id"="e52dda53-c914-4ea7-840b-8632a5770680",
> > "neutron:revision_number"="2", "neutron:router_name"=router-158}
> >
> > I enabled nb-db debug logging and searched, eg. router-158, it only shows
> > in a jsonrpc reply message
> > including 3 router-158, as the above.
> >
> > Any clues?
> >
> >
> Maybe Daniel/Lucas can comment.
>
> Thanks
> Numan
>
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > d...@openvswitch.org
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > discuss mailing list
> > disc...@openvswitch.org
> > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> d...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
