On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 12:22:01PM -0400, Flavio Fernandes wrote: > After listening to episode 72 of OVS Orbit [4], I would like to ask: > does anyone have objections to adding "indexes": [["name"]], to the > logical-router [2] and logical-switch [3] tables? I understand Ben's > point on making the implementation of the locally-cached tables have > these types of optimizations, but at the same time, I see these 2 > tables as low-hanging fruits when scaling deployments with lots of > lr's and ls's. Unless there is an implementation that use nameless > rows for these tables, I cannot think of a usage case where duplicate > names are useful. Do you?
It seems likely that this will break deployments where they don't assign meaningful names, but I don't have data to back that up. _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
