Yes, that is correct. *Vasu Dasari*
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 5:06 PM Ashish Varma <ashishvarma....@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply Vasu. > > So to clarify, if the rule gets hit, the action would send the packet out > of port number 1 (since reg0 holds the value 1)? > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:28 AM Vasu Dasari <vdas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes. You can use the registers as part of output specification. >> >> For example, this following rule works: >> >> # If reg0 is 1 and reg1 is 1, then output such packet via reg0 >> # reg0 and reg1 would have been set via learn operations earlier >> ovs-ofctl add-flow br0 table=4 reg0=1,reg1=1 actions=output:reg0 >> >> *Vasu Dasari* >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 4:58 PM Ashish Varma <ashishvarma....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I am trying to find the meaning of the following statement in the >>> ovs-actions man page: >>> >>> "Output to a register is an OpenFlow extension introduced in Open >>> vSwitch 1.3." >>> >>> Does this mean that we can specify an action like: >>> "output:<RegisterName>" and the value of the output port would be taken >>> from the given register? >>> (Just like "output:field") >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ashish >>> _______________________________________________ >>> discuss mailing list >>> disc...@openvswitch.org >>> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss >>> >>
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list disc...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
