On 2/24/23 00:36, Dr. Omran via discuss wrote:
> is it programmble? i mean: ex. nw_dst!=10.147.20.0/24 ?
No, inequality check is not supported in OpenFlow.
>
> i misunderstand your example, i think you mean the enable the allowed
> network, which is the other ip.
> I want to clarify.
> Here in this bridge, I have two traffic only
> 1- from 10.147.20.0/24 other ports on the bridge.
> 2- outside the bridge to the local ethernet port 192.168.188.0/24
>
> I want to disable traffic outside the bridge from interface enp1s0f0, which
> is connected to the NAS driver, so that it is not open to the internet.
>
> i think the rule should be as follows, to accept traffic to 10.147.20.0/24
> and other than that reject?
>
> priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=10.147.20.0/24,actions=accept
> priority=199,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,actions=drop
Sorry, I messed up IPs in my example. Your version is what I wanted to say.
Alternative is to do this (you probably shouldn't use that):
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.1.0/0.0.1.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.2.0/0.0.2.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.0.4.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.8.0/0.0.8.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.0.16.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.32.0/0.0.32.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.64.0/0.0.64.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.128.0/0.0.128.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.1.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.2.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.4.0.0/0.4.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.8.0.0/0.8.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.16.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.32.0.0/0.32.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.64.0.0/0.64.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/0.128.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=1.0.0.0/1.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/2.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=4.0.0.0/4.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=0.0.0.0/8.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=16.0.0.0/16.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=32.0.0.0/32.0.0.0,actions=drop
priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=64.0.0.0/64.0.0.0,actions=drop
It's very non-intuitive way of doing things, but it should work.
What we do is matching on opposite of every bit in 10.147.20.0/24.
24 bits total - 24 rules. Can potentially be optimized.
I generated above rules with the following python script:
import ipaddress
addr = int(ipaddress.ip_address('10.147.20.0'))
for i in range(8, 31):
print('priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=%s/%s,actions=drop' % (
ipaddress.ip_address((addr & (1 << i)) ^ (1 << i)),
ipaddress.ip_address(1 << i)))
>
>
>
> thank you
>
> kind regards
> Sherif Omran
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ilya Maximets <i.maxim...@ovn.org
> <mailto:i.maxim...@ovn.org>> wrote:
>
> On 2/23/23 14:26, Dr. Omran via discuss wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> >
> > i want to do this rule but instead of giving the destination as ip, i
> want to say a destination that is not equal to 10.147.20.0/24
> >
> > ovs-ofctl add-flow br0
> "priority=200,ip,nw_dst=192.168.188.0/24,in_port=enp1s0f0,actions=drop"
> >
> > how do you do it?
>
> You either carefully craft multiple rules that cover all the subnets
> outside of 192.168.188.0/24 , or you create a high priority rule that
> matches on 192.168.188.0/24 and does something else (jumps to another
> tbale, for example) and have a lower priority rule that doesn't have
> a match on nw_dst and drops all the traffic, e.g.:
>
>
> priority=200,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,nw_dst=192.168.188.0/24,actions=do_something_else
> priority=199,in_port=enp1s0f0,ip,actions=drop
>
> Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> disc...@openvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
disc...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-discuss
