Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 19:26 schrieb Paul Alfille:
> Clearly a bug. Now fixed (in the CVS).
>
Have you checked in already? If yes, the bug is still there.
I noticed something interesting: It seems to be connected to the caching of
the chip presence:
% OW::put 1F.0F1B05000000/discharge 1
--- Needs more time than below, don't know why ---
% OW::get alarm
1F.0F1B05000000/
% OW::get uncached
bus.7/,bus.6/,bus.5/,bus.4/,bus.3/,bus.2/,bus.1/,bus.0/,29.5E4101000000/,29.8F4101000000/,1F.071B05000000/,1F.0F1B05000000/,alarm/
% OW::put 1F.0F1B05000000/discharge 1
--- Returns "immediately" ---
% OW::get alarm
%
Kind regards
Jan
--
A Law of Computer Programming:
Make it possible for programmers to write in English and you
will find the programmers cannot write in English.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
