Am Dienstag, 12. Dezember 2006 19:26 schrieb Paul Alfille: > Clearly a bug. Now fixed (in the CVS). > Have you checked in already? If yes, the bug is still there.
I noticed something interesting: It seems to be connected to the caching of the chip presence: % OW::put 1F.0F1B05000000/discharge 1 --- Needs more time than below, don't know why --- % OW::get alarm 1F.0F1B05000000/ % OW::get uncached bus.7/,bus.6/,bus.5/,bus.4/,bus.3/,bus.2/,bus.1/,bus.0/,29.5E4101000000/,29.8F4101000000/,1F.071B05000000/,1F.0F1B05000000/,alarm/ % OW::put 1F.0F1B05000000/discharge 1 --- Returns "immediately" --- % OW::get alarm % Kind regards Jan -- A Law of Computer Programming: Make it possible for programmers to write in English and you will find the programmers cannot write in English. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers