On Dec 2, 2007 7:16 AM, Paul Alfille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general the G is backward-compatible with B. > > Paul Alfille > > > > On Dec 1, 2007 12:52 AM, Gregg C Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > Hello! > > Indeed. > > I looked at the list of gear, and naturally the one I want to use isn't on > > the list. Although all of their later models are on it. This tells me that > > Wireless-B isn't on that group's things-to-do list. > >
Hello! Indeed. And according to the bright guys at Fluke Networks, it certainly is backward compatible as you've stated. Now if it actually comes down to this, I'll probably order RSN from Amazon a LinkSYS Wireless-G router, the kind that I know all of you are using, and do the things that are supposed to be done to enable both OWFS support, and even seeing how custom firmware is running on it. But I was indeed actually looking forward to having one of the earlier models roosting here. I suppose my next step is to rouse the gang at Seattle Wireless and ask them about this...... -- Gregg C Levine [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This signature was once found posting rude messages in English in the Moscow subway." ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
