Your english is fine.
The newer implementation puts optional properties in their own subdirectory.
A few, like humidity, are left in the main directory for backwards
compatibility.
The inappropriate properties aren't a problem once you know it's normal, but
I don't like the surprise aspect.
So. What kind of values are you getting for the light sensor?
Paul Alfille
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 6:45 PM, Pascal Brugier <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:18:46 -0500, Paul Alfille <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Normal.
>
> Ok.
>
> > OWFS wasn't constructed to include or exclude properties based on the
> > values of some properties.
>
> Yes, I understand.
>
> I was surprised by the name and the value, above 300 when it's dark :),
> but it's not a problem for me.
> I just want to know if it's normal or not and now I know :)
>
> Regards,
> Pascal
>
> PS : excuse me for my bad english.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus
> on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Owfs-developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
