On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Paul Alfille <[email protected]> wrote: > It's been years since that chip's interface was designed, but I think > mincount gives the delta in counts since the last read. This mimics the > action of Louis Swart's LCD device, but with different names. I think you > can ignore it and I'm tempted to make the "mincount" invisible and see if > anyone protests. > > Paul Alfille > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Michael Markstaller <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm just working on using the ow_slave code on an attiny25 as >> DS2423-replacement and so on changing the Family-ID and wipe out the >> useless stuff (RAM, reading 16x 32byte counter-pages for keeping 2x >> 4byte values?..) >> >> And while being lazy and copying ow_2423.c, I wondered what the property >> "mincount" was meant to be? I understand what it does but not the >> intention for having it? >> The manpage also doesnt explain too much about, maybe someone can sched >> some light on ;) >> >> Michael >>
Hello! No problem here. I'm just still annoyed at the firm that they didn't bother to properly inform us, (the users) of the circumstances behind why they dropped the chip. And more importantly why they didn't supply replacements for it. ----- Gregg C Levine [email protected] "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
