OK found that, lines 111-115 are

     if (pn_raw_directory->selected_filetype != NO_FILETYPE) {
         // File, not directory
         LEVEL_CALL("return ENOTDIR pn_raw_directory=%p",
             pn_raw_directory);
         ret = -ENOTDIR;

So I guess that means that the patch is installed?

Mick


On 24/06/13 16:32, Colin Law wrote:
> On 24 June 2013 16:25, Jan Kandziora<[email protected]>  wrote:
>> Am 19.06.2013 09:39, schrieb Mick Sulley:
>>> I am sure that I hit the error in Nautilus, as to the patch I am less sure.
>>>
>>> I downloaded and installed owfs as normal and checked that it worked, I
>>> then applied the patch as you said, I then ran
>>>
>>> ./configure
>>> make
>>> sudo make install
>>>
>>> Is that correct?
>>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>>> Is there any way to check that the patch is installed?
>>>
>> No other than being careful.
> Presumably he could look at the file ow_dir.c and check that the
> LEVEL_CALL method is present at line 110 or thereabouts as described
> in the patch file.   @OP the patch file is just a text file that you
> can view with a text editor.  It is adding the lines that start with a
> + in the patch file to the file ow_dir.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Owfs-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers

Reply via email to