With my "ftdi" branch now merged to master, I'm picking this up again, 5 months since I wrote the last message below.
Any thoughts on the F0 family code, or other reasons for not merging? On 10/11/15 20:10, Johan Ström wrote: > Hi, > > a ticket was opened a few days ago regarding merging the "moat" device > specific owfs code into master: > > http://sourceforge.net/p/owfs/feature-requests/9/ > > Does anyone object that I merge this? I've run this code myself for > months without any issues. > The only reason I can come to think of is that it uses the family code > 'F0' (re older discussion: > http://sourceforge.net/p/owfs/mailman/message/33029728/). > Paul's last comment regarding type/version fields is almost fulfilled; > there is no version field, but the device advertises which different > data types (adc, counter etc) it has support for. > > I don't know about Matthias Urlichs' ideas regarding any > commercialization, for me it is for private use. But as he (I assume it > his him) mentions in the ticket, it apparently has a few users now. > > As this is a well-working and pretty easy-to-use open-source variant of > a custom owslave, I'd love to see "official" support for it! > > Regards > Johan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Owfs-developers mailing list > Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785111&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Owfs-developers mailing list Owfs-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/owfs-developers
