On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:33 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On 23-Sep-2013 12:45:40 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > > >>> You might be surprised and disappointed, but we do not > >>> officially provide a DHCP client in Owl. (We do provide a > >>> DHCP server, though.) This is something we've been meaning to > >>> change (for use cases such as yours), by introducing a properly > >>> privilege-separated DHCP client, but haven't gotten around to > >>> doing yet. > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ... > > > Are there any other security related issues specific to the client > > at the network layer? Or, are the problems/concern centered around > > a privileged separated client on the Owl machine? > > Yes, and Solar clearly stated that - see above (underlined by me). OK, good. I wanted to make sure I was not missing something. (And I know better than to go fiddling with things in this instance).
Jeff
