Dear sirs,
I need to write a rule, that will be satisfied, if there exists one
relationship between individuals and one not.
For example:
x <realestate:sameRealEstateAsCandidate> y [Constraint x != y ]
x p y [Constraint p !=
<owl:differentFrom>, x != y]
...
-------------------------------------------
x <ex:rel> y
So, when there are two individuals, that are in relationship
realestate:sameRealEstateAsCandidate, and there is not relationship
owl:differentFrom between them, then x <ex:rel> y.
But, when I made a test for following triples
ex:individual1 realestate:sameRealEstateAsCandidate ex:individual2
ex:individual1 owl:differentFrom ex:individual2
Trree created following undesired triple.
ex:individual1 ex:rel ex:individual2
Could you please help me in this? I really need this inference, it is
one key rules of our matching process. When I looked in the example
shown in the start of OWL2 RL pie file, there is wery similar example,
thus I belevie I am just making some mistake. Note, that both triples in
the premise part are implicit triples.
with kindest personal regards
miro
_______________________________________________
OWLIM-discussion mailing list
OWLIM-discussion@ontotext.com
http://ontotext.com/mailman/listinfo/owlim-discussion
