Sorry if I'm not being clear enough but by standing corrected and suggesting duchain-like system I'm obviously, IMHO, dropping the suggestion of using git, and am analysing the problem and how I think the best tool would behave like.
On Thursday 15 July 2010 08:26:58 Cyrille Berger wrote: > On Thursday 15 July 2010, iberlynx wrote: > > I stand corrected. > > > > What about my suggestion of only locking locally within a couple of words > > of other user's editing? And about using a duchain-like structure aware > > system? > > And about block formatting changes that span over other users changes, > > giving those 3 choices? > It seems to me that you are trying to fit the tool to solve the problem, > which > is a wrong approach because it will leads you to add work around to work > around. It would be better to analyse the problem and then find the best > tool. > > However, there is a very simple way to test the idea of using git for > collaborative editing of text and odf file. You can easily simulate an > editing > session, and conflict. In KWord (and I think OOWriter too) you can save a ODF > document to a directory, that you can then put under revision control by git. > If you use several KWord instance, saving to different repository, and then > manually push between the different git repository, you should be able to > test > different editing scenarios and see what works, and what does not. > > _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
