On 24 February 2011 04:30, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think Git is simpler than that. > I saves all copies of a file. There is no need to use deltas. ;-) One problem with git is that it does not resume a broken transfer. Also git does not have an API/library so you will have to call it on the command line all the time. > I think that it will be necessary to modify the way that git works because it > was created to provide versions for the whole repository (like SVN) and not > per file (like CVS) as used in other services. Anyway, this can simplify > everything. I dont think this is a big problem. One can use git log filename to find out the revisions which touch a particular file, or use git blame to see changes line by line. One can even implement a timelapse viewer on git much like http://filehost.perforce.com/downloads/media/tlv/tlv.html. A user can selectively overwrite a file at a particular version and we re-commit this in the background. All these are issues for the developer, not the user. -- Debayan Banerjee _______________________________________________ Owncloud mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
