Hi!
That was what I was talking about, we are going to implement it.
Regarding the value, in our project it actually was a quite often
requested feature and I personally find it important, too! As I
mentioned, not all users have the possibility to host their own server.
That's why we decided to focus on encryption. It's all about security!
What we need is the opinion of the ownCloud and sync app developers as I
guess they have been thinking about how they would like such a feature
to be implemented. Also we could check how seafile implemented their
client side encryption.
regards
Paul
On 2013-10-25 15:47, Bernhard Posselt wrote:
Iirc The general opinion was that we focus more on bug fixing than on features
that are very likely to come with tons of bugs, are hard and time intensive to
implement and add little value to the overall user experience
Chris <fisch....@gmx.de> schrieb:
Hi,
there are some discussion about client-side encryption available at the
bugtrackers:
https://github.com/owncloud/core/issues/106
https://github.com/owncloud/mirall/issues/275
but i don't know if there are any real plans for client-side encryption at
the moment.
--
View this message in context:
http://owncloud.10557.n7.nabble.com/Client-Side-encryption-with-OwnCloud-tp11109p11110.html
Sent from the ownCloud mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
Owncloud@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
Owncloud@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
_______________________________________________
Owncloud mailing list
Owncloud@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
