Hehe. I feel much the same way about every rule engine implementation I've ever seen. Best of luck and let us know how awesome inrule is
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Anthony <asale...@tpg.com.au> wrote: > Seems like more work then it saves! Anyway..thanks everyone for their > advice! I have requested a demo of inrule if i can get it...probably very > expensive any way! > > > > *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto: > ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Minutillo > *Sent:* Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:13 PM > *To:* ozDotNet > *Subject:* Re: Rules Engine for dotnet > > > > Depending on how complex your rules are you could always create a DSL in > Boo: http://www.manning.com/rahien/ > > > > I've never tried it personally but most rules engines I've come across > required you express concepts in really unnatural XML with either bad or no > tooling. Something that looks English-like would be far better in my > opinion. > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 6:13 AM, Winston Pang <winstonp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hey Anthony, > > > This is another one: http://www.inrule.com/ > > Ironically the place where I currently work is the reseller for it. > > Pricey though. > > HTH, > > > Winston > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Filip Kratochvil <filip...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Have a look at http://sourceforge.net/projects/nxbre/ > > > HTH, > > Filip > > > > On 6 May 2010 00:24, Anthony <asale...@tpg.com.au> wrote: > > Does their exist a rules engine software for dotnet. It would be great > to be able to control the flow of some logic without code..allowing for > flexibility and user modification. > > > > Is your website being > IntelliXperienced?<http://www.intellixperience.com/signup.aspx> > regards > Anthony (*12QWERNB*) > > Is your website being IntelliXperienced? > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Michael M. Minutillo > Indiscriminate Information Sponge > Blog: http://wolfbyte-net.blogspot.com > -- Michael M. Minutillo Indiscriminate Information Sponge Blog: http://wolfbyte-net.blogspot.com
