On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Mark Hurd <markeh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't recall were I got this from (perhaps it was once explicitly in > an employment agreement and I've assumed it was general) but I was > under the impression that ALL employee's coding (at work or home and I > am referring to employees, not contractors) is owned by the employer > (or at least has first rights to it). This is why open source > development on work or /own/ time is an issue. > > Does having rights imply having responsibility? I guess Lulz might work for some company during the day. Or it's possible he might. I just see it as a two edged sword. -- Meski http://courteous.ly/aAOZcv "Going to Starbucks for coffee is like going to prison for sex. Sure, you'll get it, but it's going to be rough" - Adam Hills
