HP LaserJet 1000.
Don't remember the model of the palm now. I guess I'll have to go see
if I can find it now. lol

Hmm it wasn't an ipaq but it was from the same period.

On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Ken Schaefer <k...@adopenstatic.com> wrote:
> What model printer? And what model Palm Pilot?
>
> Cheers
> Ken
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
> On Behalf Of Stephen Price
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2012 7:25 PM
> To: ozDotNet
> Subject: Re: Windows Phone 8 announced
>
> I know where you are coming from. There is a cost for a company when they
> abandon a product. To this day, I will never buy a HP again. They abandoned
> my laser printer and my palm pilot. Printer works fine, if I stay with
> windows XP. It actually won't work anymore. There's probably some fine print
> somewhere saying to bad, I'm on my own there.
>
> My Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 is still waiting for an Ice Cream Sandwich
> update. I could put it on there myself if I want the pain that goes with
> that. Or buy one of their new products that has ICS. Marketing ploy or are
> they just busy making it work properly so the support calls don't come in
> when they roll it out?
>
> I'm not saying its a good thing but Microsoft are not the first to do this.
> Won't be the last. It's still being driven by humans, and we aren't perfect.
>
> The real question is, so what are you going to do about it? Complain on here
> on this list or go and do something about it?
>
> Still can't believe Scott dragged my face into this. That's just low. ;)
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Bill McCarthy
> <bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au> wrote:
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Yes phones will be out of date, the question is whether it is months
>> or years. In Australia, typical contracts are 24 months, and I'm
>> pretty sure the ACCC told telcos they had to warranty devices for the
>> length of the contracts. So two years is fair to expect to be a
>> current lifetime; obviously there will be hardware improvements in
>> that time, but the software and apps available you'd reasonably expect
>> to be current. Apple deal with that by controlling the release dates
>> of devices to a new device a year and OS support roughly of +1: hence
>> you can be sure to get two years of being current.  Android has been
>> all over the place, but the big players such as Samsung are also
>> moving to give that period of currency by providing OS updates (eg Galaxy
> II).  For Windows Phone there isn't that.
>>
>> Personally the thing about this I dislike the most is not the fate of
>> my own phone (I do like my lumia), but that I can no longer recommend
>> to people they currently buy a windows phone. This is the real shame.
>> It'd be a lot better if people could upgrade: would probably still be
>> worth waiting for the newer devices for NFC. The sooner they get the
>> new devices out the better.
>>
>>
>> |-----Original Message-----
>> |From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-
>> |boun...@ozdotnet.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Price
>> |Sent: Wednesday, 27 June 2012 8:29 PM
>> |To: ozDotNet
>> |Subject: Re: Windows Phone 8 announced
>> |
>> |Why don't you two get a room? :)
>> |
>> |In an attempt to throw petrol onto a cooling fire, Microsoft don't
>> |have to
>> make
>> |new devices backward compatible. Or forward compatible.
>> |They make decisions, like any project, on what new releases mean. I
>> |don't
>> think
>> |that assuming people will be happy to upgrade their phone for a newer
>> improved
>> |one is a bad one to make. These days the majority of phones end up in
>> |a
>> draw
>> |somewhere in less than three years. The phones cost almost nothing
>> |(if you
>> are
>> |on a plan where you got your phone for $0 and you get to the end of
>> |the
>> contract
>> |period, they don't make your plan cheaper for example.) You get the
>> |option
>> to
>> |upgrade to a newer phone. If your phone is older than 2 years old
>> |then
>> phones
>> |are not that important to you (or you're money priorities lay
>> |elsewhere)
>> and no
>> |amount of new features would compel you to upgrade.
>> |
>> |I, for example, have three phones. Android, Iphone, and Windows phone 7.
>> Thats
>> |just the phones I carry in my bag, I have no idea how many phones I
>> |have at
>> home
>> |in the draw somewhere.
>> |
>> |Your phone will be out of date. Its just a question of how long that
>> |will
>> take. I'm
>> |kinda stunned that's news.
>> |
>> |As for you two fighting over what information was available, and what
>> |assumptions people made about if they can upgrade their new phone or not.
>> |heheh... it really really must tick you off. I'm not taking sides, I
>> |don't
>> care. It's
>> |been too long since anyone's butted heads on this list so, good times!
>> We'll all
>> |look back on this and laugh. If you have any sense. Take a deeeep
>> |breath,
>> and
>> |step outside. You know, outside where there's sunshine and people
>> |walking
>> about
>> |without computers n stuff. :) We're all in this together, ya know.
>> |
>> |And.... Go.
>> |
>> |On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 6:15 PM, .net noobie <dotnetnoo...@gmail.com>
>> |wrote:
>> |> what you not happy to basically call me  a liar on the list?
>> |>
>> |> you want meet face to face now... what to have a fight?
>> |>
>> |> over a telephone???
>> |>
>> |> I am not the one who has the problem bill, i am fine thanks
>> |>
>> |>
>> |> On 27 June 2012 15:03, Bill McCarthy
>> |> <bill.mccarthy.li...@live.com.au>
>> wrote:
>> |>>
>> |>> Hi David Thiessen,
>> |>>
>> |>> |so... no not after the fact, as much as your ego would like to
>> |>> |think it
>> |>> is....
>> |>> |
>> |>> |seriously, get over it, you act like a child who's mummy will not
>> |>> |buy him a
>> |>> lollie in
>> |>> |the supermarket
>> |>> |
>> |>> |yeah and you can't read, thats what i said i assumed
>> |>> |
>> |>> |you need to get over your self mate, have a cry mybe
>> |>>
>> |>>
>> |>> Okay, that's EOC here.  If you want to email me of list or discuss
>> |>> this face to face feel free to email me directly at
>> |>> b...@totalenviro.com
>> |>>
>> |>>
>>
>

Reply via email to