I would second Twitter Bootstrap. Allows you to get going with a responsive interface that looks good on desktop, tablet or mobile.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Ben Scott <b...@belfryimages.com.au> wrote: > I would start with twitter bootstrap. It is trivial to build a responsive > interface and styling past tue default is pretty simple too. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ------------------------------ > From: Arjang Assadi > Sent: 16/03/2013 10:30 AM > To: ozDotNet > Subject: Re: ASP.NET app for different devices > > Modernizer, jquery , jquery mobile to star with. > Brows stack over flow for more recent additions, almost every day there is > a new framework coming out these a days. Depending on your needs signal or > not. Most likely you won't be detecting browsers and rendering html > accordingly, that is the old way of doing things. You would be detecting > capabilities and working accordingly, kind of like programming purely with > interfaces. The html will be almost constant for all devices and browsers > but the java script library would do the rest on client, how ever that is > when minification needs to kicks in, having said that one might settle for > the minimum look instead and go for simple but fast loading interface. > > > On 16 March 2013 09:50, Greg Keogh <g...@mira.net> wrote: > >> Folks, I might have to write an ASP.NET app that looks pleasant on >> different devices such as Desktop, pad and phone. I will have to reliably >> detect the browsing device and render different html, but I've not needed >> to do this before. I'll bet someone in here has done this, and if so, can >> you give me a potted summary of what the tricks are (in the hope you can >> help me avoid hours of searching and experimental suffering). I'll start >> running some searches anyway. >> >> Thanks, >> Greg K >> > >
