I like the MIT and Apache v2 license, but I think Corneliu needs a commercial license that would restrict how the code for the plugins can be used. --------- Original Message ---------Subject: RE: Re: Commercial Source Code Licence From: Jason Roberts <jasi...@yahoo.co.uk> Date: 4/18/13 9:48 pm To: "ozDotNet" <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
I use apache v2 for my os http://www.nuget.org/packages/FeatureToggle project as I believe it's one of the more commercially friendly options? From: a...@nomscon.com Sent: 19/04/2013 9:46 AM To: ozDotNet Subject: RE: Re: Commercial Source Code Licence Just an FYI, the Creative Commons organization discourages the use of CC licenses for software: http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FAQ#Can_I_use_a_Creative_Commons_license_for_software.3F You may wan to search http://www.legalzoom.com/ to see if they might have what you need. But I would recommend seeing an attorney/lawyer with software experience. --------- Original Message ---------Subject: Re: Commercial Source Code Licence From: Ben Scott <b...@belfryimages.com.au> Date: 4/18/13 8:55 pm To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com I release my oss projects as CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) which is a really easy licence that allows commercial use and modification. IANAL but my understanding is that there is no requirement to actually release or open source any commercial modifications. On 19/04/2013 10:33 AM, Corneliu I. Tusnea wrote: > Hi, > > I have for our app few PHP plugins that we distribute that work in > combination with our application. > I need to add some licence information to these plugins but I'm not > sure what would be a valid licence to allow users to change it if they > need to make it work with our service but not redistribute it or use > it for any other purposes/apps. > > The GPL/MIT/.. they all seem driven towards open-source ... > > Regards, > Corneliu.
