Universal apps are lovely. there you go.
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Greg Keogh <g...@mira.net> wrote: > It’s interesting to read the comments, and the Microsoft replies – about >> what is currently missing from “universal” and why Silverlight is more >> suitable, at present. >> > > Good grief! I didn't previously scroll down to see those comments. I don't > think this migration to WinRT should have been announced until all of the > glaring omissions were available. Alarms, reminders, copy-paste, local > database, WCF (they must be kidding, or can't talk to anything)... The > whole RT and winmd files thing leaves me bewildered by more divergence and > too many choices, everything is fragmenting without a clear goal in sight. > Has anyone got anything nice to say about "universal apps"?-- *Greg K* >
