In case you haven't seen it already, some interesting improvements on leap
years:

https://youtu.be/qkt_wmRKYNQ

David

"If we can hit that bullseye, the rest of the dominoes
 will fall like a house of cards... checkmate!"
 -Zapp Brannigan, Futurama

On 29 February 2016 at 15:59, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> It's a leap day, so I reckon it's a good excuse to go off topic. Remember
> when 2000 *was* a leap year because it was divisible by 400? Did that
> contribute to the COBOL bugs, or did they think 00 was 1900 and were okay?
>
> *GK*
>

Reply via email to