> Rob Eisenberg worked on Angular2 (and Caliburn*). He likes his
conventions.
Yeah, really smart guy. I like his conventions :)
Who the f*** could come up with this syntax?
- *ngFor
- [(ngModel)]=
- [model]=
- {{model}}
- (click)=
- *ngIf
- [class.selected]
And the @NgModule redundancies in code are a killer. Why do you need to
declare the same stuff twice? and sometimes also add it to the constructor?
Really? Twice ... trice ... ?
[image: Inline image 2]
I mean even PHP now looks sexy :)
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Nic Roche <nicro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > moved to Aurelia (www.aurelia.io)
>
>
> Rob Eisenberg worked on Angular2 (and Caliburn*). He likes his conventions.
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com> on
> behalf of Corneliu I. Tusnea <corne...@acorns.com.au>
> *Sent:* Friday, 21 October 2016 9:20 PM
> *To:* ozDotNet
> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certification
>
> You too Paul?
>
> I also gave up on Angular 2 and moved to Aurelia (www.aurelia.io) and I
> love it.
> <http://www.aurelia.io/>
> Home | Aurelia <http://www.aurelia.io/>
> www.aurelia.io
> Aurelia is the most powerful, flexible and forward-looking JavaScript
> client framework in the world.
>
>
> I think Angular 2 has the "done by the big guys syndrome". I don't know
> anyone (yet) who used Aurelia and ever looked back at A2!
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Paul Glavich <subscripti...@theglavs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Gave up on Ang2. I don’t like the direction and the Release process was
>> silly. Aurelia I find much much better.
>>
>>
>>
>> - Glav
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ozdot
>> net.com] *On Behalf Of *Nick Randolph
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:11 PM
>> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
>> *Subject:* RE: [OT] Angular certification
>>
>>
>>
>> We’re just in process of publish an app written in Angular 2, so yes,
>> definitely taking it seriously. A lot of pain upgrading from Beta/RC to RTM
>> (it’s like they didn’t understand what Beta/RC means).
>>
>>
>>
>> *Nick Randolph* | *Built to Roam Pty Ltd* | Microsoft MVP – Windows
>> Platform Development | +61 412 413 425 | @thenickrandolph |
>> skype:nick_randolph
>> The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this
>> email in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the integrity of
>> any emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the
>> author's own and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty
>> Ltd.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-bounces@ozdot
>> net.com <ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com>] *On Behalf Of *Tom P
>> *Sent:* Thursday, 13 October 2016 3:05 PM
>> *To:* ozDotNet <ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OT] Angular certification
>>
>>
>>
>> Angular 2 is entirely redone. TypeScript makes it also bearable
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 14:54, Greg Keogh <gfke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Are there any Angular certifications you guys can recommend that may be
>> taken seriously?
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone even take Angular seriously?!
>>
>>
>>
>> I thought it was already abandoned by the author who went off to write a
>> new competing BlahJS, or is a new group completely rewriting it to Angular
>> 2, or something like that? They all blur together.
>>
>>
>>
>> *GK*
>>
>>
>>
>
>
