:" If ease of development was our primary concern we would all be building Microsoft Access apps. "
You cannot be serious. "Ease of development" and "MS Access" do not belong in the same sentence. On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 14:13, David Connors via ozdotnet < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 13:44, Dr Greg Low <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yep, we talk about browsers like there’s consistency there. There still >> isn’t. And it’s a huge hit on productivity. I see so much lost effort >> trying to align pixels across different browsers, different versions of >> browsers, etc. It’s just silly. >> >> >> >> I remember being on a web app project. I was doing the data bits, and >> there were 10 devs doing the web parts. >> >> >> >> After 6 months, I looked at what the other 10 had produced and knew I >> could have built that myself in a winform app in a fortnight, by myself. >> > > This is probably more down to approach. If they were building from scratch > by themselves, then I agree, productivity will be terrible; however on the > flip side, you have to remember that 80+% of the cost of software is after > the code is written and in the support phase. For our internal apps, we use > a commercial off the shelf theme and a couple of other components and stick > with those. The consistency of UI layout, responsiveness across form > factors etc is all done very cost effectively by using something like: > https://angular-material.fusetheme.com/dashboards/project - best $700 > you'll ever spend. > > If ease of development was our primary concern we would all be building > Microsoft Access apps. > > -- > ozdotnet mailing list > To manage your subscription, access archives: https://codify.mailman3.com/
-- ozdotnet mailing list To manage your subscription, access archives: https://codify.mailman3.com/
