http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,16318814%255E23289,00.html
Liability ruling delivers
fuel to midwife debate DOCTORS and midwives are at
loggerheads over their legal liabilities from new-style birthing units after a
hospital sued an obstetrician to recover a share of the $7.5million it was
ordered to pay for a birth mishap involving a midwife. But midwives
such as Robyn Rudner, who works at the Ryde midwifery group practice in She said while
the Ryde and Belmont units had good safety records, midwives would remain
legally responsible for any mistakes they made. "We are
fully responsible for women under our care as midwives, and when we transfer
women to a hospital we remain responsible (for their own actions)," she
said.
The legal case,
adjourned this week in the NSW Supreme Court, was mounted by the Greater
Southern Area Health Service in NSW. The doctor
being sued was an on-call obstetrician when the baby was born in September
1995. While the delivery was handled by a midwife in the obstetrician's
absence, the health service claims the doctor failed to adequately supervise
the case. It was ordered to pay the mother $7.5million in April 2003, and is
now seeking a contribution from the obstetrician. Pieter Mourik,
a retired obstetrician from Albury, NSW, claimed the case bore out fears
doctors would continue to carry the responsibility for mishaps in a midwife's
delivery. Dr Mourik said
the case was "dynamite" and it was "unheard of" for a
hospital to sue a doctor for a procedure carried out by another health worker. However, Andrew Bisits, director of
obstetrics at |
- [ozmidwifery] Liability ruling in Weekend Australian Tania Smallwood
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Liability ruling in Weekend Austra... Sally-Anne Brown
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Liability ruling in Weekend Au... Tania Smallwood