Yes, that's right.  My newest grandson (now 4 weeks old) had only 2 vessels and the ob/ultrasonographer said that the association with renal anomolies has now been disproven.
Joy
 
Joy Cocks RN (Div 1) RM CBE IBCLC
BRIGHT Vic 3741
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 17:15 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] two vessel cords

Actually recent research has discounted the association with renal agenesis & other genetic anomalies that we all used to think of as a possibility with 2 vessel cords.
I read it on the Ox mid site recently (I think).
 
Kind Regards
Brenda Manning
www.themidwife.com.au
----- Original Message -----
From: cath nolan
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] two vessel cords

this can be an indicator of renal anomalies in a small percentage of babies . It is worth a scan i believe. I have worked in a neonatal unit and do remember the babies affected. This must always be balanced with the fact that there are plenty of babies that have no problems apparrent.
 
Cath
 
- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:19 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] two vessel cords

Hi everyone,

I have a pregnant friend with a two vessel cord and wondered if anyone had some info on what this may mean.  I had it myself and was told the baby would need a renal scan at one week old to check for renal anomolies.  Indeed, she does have urinary reflux, but I know that a two vessel cord does not necessarily mean renal problems.  I know that this was brought up a little while back but I have lost track of the info

Kind regards




 

Kylie Carberry

Freelance Journalist

p: +61242970115

m: +612418220638

f: +61242970747

-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Reply via email to