Kelly I don’t know of any definitive
studies which can show that. The original work was done 60 yrs or more
ago that showed the split was 40/60 for nature/nurture or was it the other way
around? There have been arguments about it for generations. The
area to look would probably be the behavioral scientists. The underlying
belief of many people is that “as you think, so you are”. If
that is rubbish to someone else, then they won’t accept that they can
influence or change anything. A very helpless place to be.(a greater
majority of the population). I can’t remember the author, but “Babies
Remember Birth” might be helpful. It talks a lot of fact about
babies foetal development. I am sure there are knowledgeable people on
the Help! Someone started a discussion on my forums about birth
and how it shapes the baby as an individual. Of course, everyone thought that concept
was ludicrous, think studies and percentages are rubbish and must think I am a
quack for thinking otherwise LOL J Can anyone else
back me up?! I need some support!!! If you aren’t signed up in my forums,
please feel free to, or post here any suggestions or comments. http://www.bellybelly.com.au/forums/showthread.php?t=17144 Best
Regards, |
- [ozmidwifery] Birth, Trauma & Persona... Kelly @ BellyBelly
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Birth, Trauma &... Mary Murphy
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Birth, Trauma &... Kerrie Thomas
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Birth, Trauma &... Michelle Windsor
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Birth, Trauma ... Stephen & Felicity
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Birth, Tra... Vandenput - Geerdens
- [ozmidwifery] breastfeed... Honey Acharya
- Re: [ozmidwifery] b... Honey Acharya
- Re: [ozmidwifery] b... Barbara Glare & Chris Bright
- Re: [ozmidwifer... Honey Acharya
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Birth,... jesse/jayne
- Re: [ozmidwifery] B... Jo Bourne