To help keep everyone in the loop, here are Joy's
notes from the Melbourne meeting yesterday.
Andrea Bilcliff
----- Original Message -----
From: Joy Johnston
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: [Midwives_Insurance] Notes from meeting with Contracting
Advantage Meeting for midwives with Anne
OConnor of Contracting Advantage (CA) Tuesday 5/9/06
3-5pm At Midwives present: Robyn Thompson,
Helen Sandner, Andrea Bilcliff, Michelle Popple, Bronwyn Harris, Purpose of meeting: to discuss CAs
offer to provide Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance for self-employed
midwives. For information on CA, go to www.contractingadvantage.com/
CA is a private company, and they
have already negotiated a plan for $10 Million cover with their broker, Jardine
Lloyd Thomas in A midwife who signs up with CA would
be charged an annual fee of $500, plus approx 6% of all invoices we
create. The system that they offer provides
an accounting system whereby a midwife would give an invoice to a client for her
services, and the client would deposit the money into an account belonging to
CA. (If cash is paid, the midwife can transfer the money). CA
processes the money into Tax 20%, agency management fee 5%, and insurances
approx 1%, and anything else that the midwife wants to have taken out such as
superannuation, or income protection. The remainder is sent the next day
to the midwifes account, and the midwife receives a statement of
earnings. CAs agency fee provides bookkeeping services for members,
including preparation of BAS. CA has no interest in the fee
charged, or the number of births, or any details of how the midwife
practises. They need to be sure that a person is a midwife, and this can
be checked via the public register at the Board. (they do the same for tradesmen
&c) CA charges a $2,500 excess on every
claim. There are some technical questions that Robyn put, and these
need to be answered formally. I felt satisfied from my perspective that
the plan would provide PI insurance, which is the big need, and the first
priority. There are 2 systems operated by
CA. The first is what I have described above, which would provide for
independent midwives such as those of us who are practising now.
The other system is called ODCO,
which is a self employed contractor who does most of her/his work for one
employer. CA has an arrangement with the employer, and the employer pays
the money earned by the independent contractors in the same way that nurse
agencies get paid for supplying staff. The possibilities here are very
big, in that hospitals could use this system for midwives who want to be self
employed but want to provide the acute/ birth care in the hospital. Also
this system could replace nurses agencies that are already in operation, if it
had an enterprising business person to run it. This idea has a lot of
possibilities. The next step is to get 200
midwives. The list that Barb Vernon has generated has 90 names, and we
know others who have not yet put their names on the list. There may not be
200 who are currently earning enough to make the $500 seem reasonable.
Those who are working primarily in hospital jobs, but are willing to attend
homebirths occasionally may fee its too much. If you spread it over even
10 births in a year its not much, and can be passed on to the client, but if
you only have 2 births in the year, thats a big burden. However I think
once the insurance becomes available the pressure will quickly mount on all
midwives to get it, so it wont be an option any longer. This possible
shortfall in numbers may be something that needs attention perhaps pressure on
health ministers to provide support to get it started
initially. I hope this gives you useful
information. I do think it will open the possibilities of hospital
visiting access for independent midwives.
If you know any midwife who is
interested but is not on one of these yahoo groups, please forward this message
to her/him and ask them to request an invitation to the list.
many
thanks Joy
Johnston |
- [ozmidwifery] Fw: Notes from meeting with Contracting Adva... Andrea Bilcliff
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Notes from meeting with Contrac... Tania Smallwood
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Notes from meeting with Contrac... cath nolan
- Re: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Notes from meeting with Contrac... Jennifairy
- RE: [ozmidwifery] Fw: Notes from meeting with Con... Tania Smallwood