There are 4 options remains:

https://hackmd.io/uqSYkmd8SXGAAjQx3sObQg?both

I think 2 (use the same volume for all the s3 buckets) and 3 (use volume-bucket format for s3 bucket names) are both very limited. 3 means that we remove the support of volumes for the whole s3 world, half part of the Ozone.

The remaining ones: 1 and 4

4: remove the volume from the path of o3fs/ofs and use the same url for both S3 and Hadoop File system. But keep the volume functionality (use it as an administrative group).

I know it makes harder to disjoint namespaces but it 1). I don't know what is the exact plan about that one 2). It seems to be possible with caching volume -> bucket information on the clinet side

1: restrict the view of the buckets to one volume per AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY. Slightly more clear, but still has some confusion as you might see two different content with the same bucket name but different secret.

I prefer the solution 4 and 1 is my second preference.

Is there any more arguments / concerns about the proposed solution (against 4 or 1)

Thanks,
Marton





On 3/3/20 6:08 PM, Elek, Marton wrote:

This is not true, as we use only use access key id during the creation of
s3 bucket to generate volume name from accessKeyID.
For other requests like create/list/read key, the flow is
1. GetVolumeName(Bucket)
2.GetVolume(GetVolumeName(Bucket))
3.GetBucket


Got it, thanks to explain it. It's more confusing than I thought :-( Even if a volume is defined for an ACCESS_KEY_ID, it's not guaranteed to be the volume for a specific bucket (as it's used only to __create__ the buckets).

What do you think about defining the volume name for the ACCESS_KEY_ID as the current namespace/context. Remove the mapping table at all and always use the actual volume during **any* operation? (similar to the kubernetes current context...)

I rewrote the document and added 4 options (unfortunately all of them are painful...), including this one.

https://hackmd.io/uqSYkmd8SXGAAjQx3sObQg?both

Can you please add if you have more (and add pro/con to any of them if you see...)

Thanks a lot,
Marton

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to