Thanks to work on this Nanda.
*Do we still need the following branches?* HDDS-3710 master-stable acceptance-coverage debug-acceptance-timeout integration-test-cleanup
They can be deleted, AFAIK. acceptance-coverage can be needed to test the coverage measurement of acceptance tests. But I can recreate if needed (and will delete after the usage, I promise ;-) )
BTW: I propose to use a name-convention for all of the feature branches: HDDS-XXX-lower-case-name For example: * HDDS-2665-ofs using a postfix for long-live, feature branches can help to identify them. What do you think? Thanks, Marton --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
