+1 to update the version to 1.0.0.

Anyone objecting to the version number change can respond to the release vote. 
We don't need a separate vote thread.


On 8/12/20, 7:31 AM, "Sammi Chen" <[email protected]> wrote:

    We have resolved all JIRAs targeting 0.6.0 by today.  Thanks everyone for
    your continuous contribution!

    All 0.6.0 commits are cherry-picked from master to ozone-0.6.0, except this
    revert request(https://github.com/apache/hadoop-ozone/pull/1313) which is
    pending for confirmation.

    I will start to build the first RC package tomorrow.

    As for the proposal to change the version from 0.6.0 to 1.0.0,  do we need
    3 "+1" to proceed?

    Thanks,
    Sammi

    On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 3:27 AM Dinesh Chitlangia <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    > +1 for 1.0.0 as GA
    >
    > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 8:32 AM Sammi Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Marton,  good idea. 1.0.0 is a good candidate for GA version.
    > >
    > > I will wait a few days in case there is other feedback.
    > >
    > > Sammi
    > >
    > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 6:03 PM Elek, Marton <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > >
    > > > On 7/10/20 11:50 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote:
    > > > > +1 for GA as well.
    > > > >
    > > > > We have done lots of compatibility testing with Ozone with Hive and
    > > > Spark. >
    > > >
    > > > I have the same question as on the Ratis side.
    > > >
    > > > If we think it's GA, why don't we call it 1.0.0 ?
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Marton
    > > >
    > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    >

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to