Well thats ok then. *blush*

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Scott Barnes <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Which video playback ? i.e. the “videos” section is based on what site
> who owns it nominates. For us to go in an hijack these and play them inside
> Silverlight well there’s a whole set of legal pain that we’d rather avoid.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Price
> *Sent:* Monday, June 01, 2009 6:57 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
>
>
> While we are on the subject of new releases, I draw your attention to the
> new Microsoft search site, Bing.com. I'm a little surprised that Silverlight
> is not being used for video playback, rather Flash. They could have put code
> in there to check if you have Silverlight and fall back to Flash rather than
> just use Flash exclusively? Come on! We want Silverlight! :)
>
>
>
> comments? is this sending the wrong message out? I can totally understand
> Silverlight is not everywhere yet but what a perfect opportunity to get it
> everywhere. Give them an option to go with Silverlight and if they say no,
> then fall back to Flash.
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> Stephen
>
> p.s. Insert <soapbox/> tags above as appropriate. :)
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Tim Heuer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> No you didn't (at least that's my opinion)...but the interwebs are clogged
> with people agreeing with one person that there is a comparison. I suspect
> people actually didn't read his article but rather just the titilating
> headline.
>
> I agree that Silverlight could be a client to the wave
> protocol/communication platform at some point.
>
>
> -th
>
> tim heuer | (602) 405-4567 | im: [email protected]
> blog: http://timheuer.com/blog/ | twitter: @timheuer
> ________________________________________
>
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Scott Barnes [[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:48 PM
>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> I don’t understand why people are comparing the two? Google Wave =
> Protocol, client is just the “default” skin if you will. Developers will
> always game companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple etc if the said solution
> is popular. Providing a shared protocol for all to tap into is a platform
> play ☺
>
> Silverlight could be part of that client story? So it’s no different to
> Google releasing GMAPS tomorrow? Seems a bit weird to compare the two – or
> did I miss the ball completely on this one? ☺
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Tim Heuer
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 5:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> Ha! I hope people actually read my post deeper…because that’s what I’m
> saying specifically. Google Wave instantly drew comparisons from an article
> based on “karma” – which based on drawing comparisons to Silverlight and
> Wave. I thought that was incorrect myself. Now if people want to debate
> HTML5 vs. RIA platforms…
>
> Cheers,
>
> -th
>
> Tim Heuer | (602) 405-4567 | im: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> blog: http://timheuer.com/blog/ | twitter: @timheuer<
> http://twitter.com/timheuer>
>
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steven Berry
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 4:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> Either way its great for Scott to keep us on edge….
>
> On a side note Google I/O<
> http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2009/05/30/google-wave-forces-out-silverlight-flash-ria-platforms.aspx>
> Silverlight/Flash killer?
>
>
> Now come on that’ll never be the case ………………….
>
> From: Perry Stathopoulos [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2009 9:09 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> Well that sucks as a comment...unless the smiley is meant as a wink to mean
> that it's true but you can't say.
>
> From: Scott Barnes<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 1:19 PM
>
> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]
> >
>
> Subject: RE: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> No comment ☺
>
> --
> Scott Barnes
> Rich Platforms Product Manager
>
> Microsoft Corp.<http://www.microsoft.com/> | Blog:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/msmossyblog | Office: +1 (425) 5382410 X82410
> Twitter: twitter.com/mossyblog<http://twitter.com/mossyblog> | MSN:
> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
>
> P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this
> e-mail
>
>
>  From: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Perry Stathopoulos
>
> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 9:07 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Silverlight 3 to be released July 10
>
> Ars Technica is reporting that SL3 and Expression Studio 3 are launching
> July 10. If that is true that great news!
>
> http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009/05/silverlight-3-and-expression-studio-3-launching-july-10.ars
>
> Why isn't there more buzz about this? From what I have seen none of the
> regular Silverlight bloggers are talking about this. I would think this is a
> big deal?!?
> http://silverlight.net/blogs/silverlight/
>
> Can we get some kind of confirmation or denial? Anyone know anything about
> this?
>
> Perry
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this
> e-mail from your system. No responsibility is assumed by the company or its
> employee to any other person for any loss or damage (whether caused by
> negligence or not) arising from the use of the information and advice
> contained herein. Finally, it is your responsibility to check any
> attachments for viruses and defects before opening or sending them on.
>
> ________________________________
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
> ________________________________
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
>
> List address: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Subscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]>
>
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
> List address: [email protected]
> Subscribe: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
> List address: [email protected]
> Subscribe: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
>   ------------------------------
> Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
> List address:
> [email protected]
>
> Subscribe: [email protected]
> Unsubscribe: [email protected]
> List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
> Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Support procedure: https://www.codify.com/lists/support
List address: [email protected]
Subscribe: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: [email protected]
List FAQ: http://www.codify.com/lists/ozsilverlight
Other lists you might want to join: http://www.codify.com/lists

Reply via email to