On 22.09.2015 11:55, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 15:12 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> 
>> Several functions (such as CloseAllSessions()) in PKCS#11 act
>> globally.
>> By returning a different closure for those function pointers to each
>> caller, we can scope those effects. We don't do this only in the
>> proxy
>> module, but throughout the PKCS#11 API.
>>
>> The following functions are routinely wrapped in a closure:
>>
>> C_Initialize
>> C_Finalize
>> C_CloseAllSessions
>> C_CloseSession
>> C_OpenSession
>>
>> In addition, if things like remoting or logging are enabled, then all
>> functions are wrapped ... so their arguments can be remoted or logged
>> respectively.
> [...]
>>  2. We could precompile NNNN closures into the executable, and these
>>     would be consumed as necessary. This is how p11-kit used to 
>> perform 
>>     this task. It's really horrible code ... but could be done as a
>> last
>>     resort ... and the code is in the git history.
> 
> I've tried with avoiding the tmpdir in libffi, and have the same issue
> with executable memory. So I think we are at this point... 

That would place a static limit on the amount of callers of any
"managed" PKCS#11 modules in p11-kit. What is the number you think is
appropriate to limit that to to in a single process?

Stef


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
p11-glue mailing list
p11-glue@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/p11-glue

Reply via email to